Choose a casino affiliate programme by matching its permitted audience, market and traffic source to the work you can actually produce. Then compare qualification, the commission base, reporting and payment conditions. A programme with the highest public rate is not necessarily the best match for your audience or your cash flow.
Start with your constraints
Before building a shortlist, write down the audience country, language, content or advertising format, existing channel and budget. Someone with a specialist website needs different reporting and permissions from a creator with an adult video audience. A programme is not suitable if your intended source is excluded, even when its headline rate looks attractive.
A comparison you can actually complete
Use the same questions for every programme. Record the answer, where it comes from and its date. Do not award a high score merely because a website uses the words fast payments or high conversion.
| Decision | Evidence to request | Pass condition |
|---|---|---|
| Audience fit | Permitted countries, language and product | Your actual audience is eligible. |
| Channel permission | Written source and creative rules | Your specific placement is accepted. |
| Commercial result | Qualification and commission definition | You can reproduce the calculation. |
| Reporting | Sample fields, delays and rejection reasons | You can reconcile approved results. |
| Cash timing | Validation, threshold and payment process | You can fund the waiting period. |
| Ongoing terms | Caps, inactivity and termination | You understand the limits before launch. |
Three public programmes, three research starting points
Betsson publishes brand-level commission information. LeoVegas provides detailed contractual treatment of revenue and exceptions. N1 publishes standard tiers and source-dependent conditions in its terms. These are different documents, not a like-for-like performance test. The public commissions guide records the checked information and what still needs confirmation.
What would make one programme better for you?
For a publisher, useful differentiators may be stable attribution and clear rules for original reviews. For a community owner, the approved placement and adult audience matter. For a paid-media team, qualification, caps, reporting delays and cash requirements shape the test. None of those questions can be answered by a logo alone.
Before you send traffic
Save the accepted agreement, permission for the intended campaign and an operator-approved method to verify tracking. Ask who resolves a discrepancy and how long you have to raise one. Keep unresolved answers in the shortlist. If the programme cannot explain what earns commission, you do not yet have a measurable campaign.
Apply with a useful brief
Win Commission reviews applications individually. Explain your source, audience and countries, then discuss suitable conditions if an opportunity is available. You do not need to claim results you have not achieved. A beginner can describe a concrete first project; an experienced team can provide an approximate volume and reporting requirements.
Sources & review notes
Primary programme terms and platform policies can change. External examples do not establish Win Commission rates or offer availability. How we research and review.
- Betsson Group Affiliates: published commissionsChecked 29 October 2026. Public headline terms vary by brand. These are not Win Commission rates.
- LeoVegas Affiliates: terms, version 1.23Checked 29 October 2026. Effective 21 October 2026. Read the exceptions and any individual agreement.
- N1 Partners: affiliate terms and conditionsChecked 29 October 2026. The inspected page identifies its last update as 11 April 2023. Confirm the version offered before accepting.
Bring your starting point.
Tell us about your skills, channel and intended audience. Applications are reviewed individually. Suitable terms and campaign access are confirmed separately.